PLEASE CLICK TO ENLARGE IMAGES:
The Last Great Picture by Michael 'Nick' Nichols.
This time last year I wrote a blog post about the 2013 competition (here) and started a Facebook discussion (here), both of which seemed to resonate with many photographers. For those who don't want to wade though either discussion, my main grievances were the dominance of 'flagship' species (lions, tigers, polar bears, penguins etc) and the almost complete absence of insects and other invertebrates in both 2013 and 2012 competitions. Other photographers made similar points. Whether as a direct result of these public discussions or not, two new categories were added to the 2014 competition - Amphibians and Reptiles, and Invertebrates.
So how have these changes affected the images in this year's competition? Well, I'm pleased to see that the presence of 'flagship' species amongst the 2014 winning images is notably reduced. The various category winners feature a mouse, herons, click beetle larvae, a green vine snake and so on and the competition is better for it in my opinion. Quite simply the winning images are more representative of the world's various animal taxa than they were in previous years. That has to be a good thing.
So what about the images themselves? I must admit I was a little underwhelmed at first. I think the overall winning image is 'nice', but that's about it. It's a pleasant image. It doesn't grab me and I find the wonky horizon somewhat distracting (not to mention surprising!). However, having dug a little deeper into the winning images I've found there are quite a few that I really do like. Here are a selection:
Glimpse of the Underworld by Christian Vizl
Little Squid by Fabien Michenet
I think the Little Squid image above is absolutely stunning. This image must have been very technically demanding but is creative, other-worldly and highly original.
Winter Hang-Out by Lukasz Bozycki
The Great Arrival by Sergio Pucci
Night of the Deadly Lights by Ary Bassous
and there are others too. All of these images are interesting, original and attractive.
Inevitably there are other images that I'm less keen on and one or two that are rather formulaic. I won't single any out but I sometimes wonder whether the judges are as familiar with previous entries to this competition as I am :)
So overall I think this year has been an improvement on last year's competition. The winning images are more varied in terms of subject matter and include a number that I consider to be of very high quality. Those positives are inevitably tempered slightly by the overall winning image which strikes me as a rather safe and conservative choice.
Finally, a couple of disclaimers:
Finally, a couple of disclaimers:
Disclaimer 1: The above comments obviously represent my entirely subjective views. I simply speak as someone who has followed the WPOTY for many years and who holds the competition in great affection.
Disclaimer 2: By way of transparency, I should point out that I did enter this year's competition but, despite making the final round, I didn't make it into the winning images.
Disclaimer 2: By way of transparency, I should point out that I did enter this year's competition but, despite making the final round, I didn't make it into the winning images.
No comments:
Post a Comment