Tuesday, 22 May 2012

(Fairly) Wideangle Macro

A previous post on this blog discussed my attempts to shoot wideangle macro, or more accurately wideangle close-ups, with the Tokina 10-17mm fisheye lens. This lens is a very effective fisheye but makes close-ups difficult because of its relative lack of magnification. It only really works with larger insects and the lens is still virtually touching the insect (quite literally).

Another lens I've been interested in for some time is the Tokina 35mm macro. Although obviously not as wideangle as the 10-17mm, this is a true macro lens capable of 1x magnification. In principle it should therefore allow small insects to be relatively large in the frame while still giving an impression of the insect's environment.

Anyway, I recently gave in to temptation and this post provides some of my first experiments with the Tokina 35mm macro lens.

PLEASE CLICK ON IMAGES TO ENLARGE

A small (10mm) Nomada bee on a grass stalk




In case you're wondering how the focal length of different macro lenses affects the background of an image, even when all are shooting at 1x magnification, I've just knocked up the following comparison using 3 different macro lenses. The subject is an AA battery balanced on its end with my keyboard in the background.

*Please note that these shots were taken quickly on my desk in very poor light so none of the images are sharp but hopefully it demonstrates the differences!*


The left hand image was taken with the Tokina 35mm macro, the middle image with my Canon MP-E 65mm lens and the right hand image with my Sigma 150mm macro. All images were taken at 1x magnification and hence the subject is roughly the same size in each. What is interesting is the difference in the backgrounds. Clearly, the 35mm image contains a lot more of the keyboard, particularly compared to the 150mm image. The 35mm lens can therefore produce macro images but will include much more of the landscape/environment. Incidentally, you can see that lighting is still an issue for the 35mm lens when shooting at 1x as the lens has to be very close to the subject. Shooting at a little less than 1x obviously helps this.

The Nomada bee image above is one image that I have taken recently with this lens. This was taken at approximately 1x magnification (maybe a little less) and I used a 3 flash set-up to get some light on the insect. I'm fairly pleased with this image as I do like this style of shot as it gives a sense of the insect's habitat. A bit of blue sky always helps as well, in my opinion.

I have also taken a few images of ladybirds in amongst a chive plant in my garden:





and here's a Hairy Footed Flower Bee on a dandelion:



and a Grizzled Skipper butterfly:



If I used an aperture such as f20 or 22 it would provide more detail in the background and hence provide a more typical 'wideangle macro' look. Unfortunately I haven't yet had the opportunity to open the lens beyond f13, which is what I used in the test shot below. Unfortunately it was far too windy on the day in question to stop down any further.

test shot at f13 to illustrate what might be possible at f20 or 22 

This lens is therefore capable of a style of macro image that wouldn't really be possible with more conventional macro lenses. In my opinion, it works best with a mix of natural light and flash. I hope to take more images of this nature throughout the summer.

4 comments:

  1. A great collection of shots, Matt. I've always admired your wide-angle macros so hopefully with this new lens we'll be seeing more!

    ReplyDelete
  2. thanks Simon, much appreciated. It's a style of photography I've always particularly liked so hopefully there'll be more to come!

    ReplyDelete
  3. looks a very promissing lens, a sweet spot for some environment and sould not cause much trouble with extension tubes (the 10-22 even with the shorter one almost touch the subject, this one should allow a breath)

    ReplyDelete
  4. thanks Gustavo. It is a nice lens, although I don't think it will take extension tubes as the minimum focus point is already very close to the front of the lens. Thanks for your comment.

    ReplyDelete